Tuesday 17 September 2013

AM: Alex Turner's lyrical mastery

I often groan when I hear songs on the radio with terrible, terrible lyrics. I slap my forehead dramatically when I hear Pitbull rhyming 'Kodak' with 'Kodak'. I furrow my eyebrows when Robin Thicke asks 'What rhymes with hug me?' (I hope he means Bill Crosby or rugby but somehow I doubt that). So, I am thrilled that the Arctic Monkeys are back with their new album AM because this means I can appreciate Alex Turner's lyrical genius once again.


Turner is notorious for his clever and witty songwriting skills. The fast pace lyrics in 'I bet you look good on the dance floor' recreate the tense and loud atmosphere of a nightclub. In 'Fluorescent Adolescent', the memorable opening lines ('You used to get it in your fishnets...') immediately draws you into the story Turner invented about a woman dealing with aging. The new album, which has debuted at number 1 in the UK, does not disappoint on the lyrical front. 'Why'd you only call me when you're high?' is the sarcastic third single depicting the aftermath of a night out and seeking the attention of an ex. The songwriter has spoken to the NME about the lyrical patterns in 'R U Mine?' being inspired by rappers like Lil Wayne and Drake. You cannot deny that Turner is a creative lyricist and enjoys experimenting with new patterns to portray a story in Arctic Monkey songs. 

Some people have asked if we can consider Alex Turner as a poet. A few years ago The Guardian brought out a supplement series called 'Great Lyricists of the 20th Century'. Alex Turner was one of the musicians honoured and I took the supplement on a car journey. I devoured the lyrics in this supplement, I loved finding the images within them and genuinely enjoyed the verses on page, so I agree with 'some people' to an extent. Turner certainly seems to promote poetry by putting John Cooper Clarke's 'I Wanna Be Yours' to music in AM. Turner is a musician who holds language and storytelling as a priority in his music, and I believe more popular artists should do the same. 

Sunday 15 September 2013

Book shame

Reader, what you are about to read may shock you. It is a confession; and it may rock you to the core. I have a literary secret that has haunted me since childhood. Prepare yourself. I, reader, have never read a Harry Potter book cover to cover. Born in 1994, I am now 19, and I never took part in the Potter craze that swept through my generation. I am an outsider from the fictional world that so many of my peers claim 'shaped' their youth.

Now, I understand this may come as a shock to you. This is my 'book shame'. We all do this, don't we? Pretending we have read something when we haven't. We all avoid interrupting a culture-driven conversation because we are too embarrassed to admit that, no, we haven't read Bleak House or Wuthering Heights in its entirety. We know it's a classic, and yes we've really tried to read it (promise) but it just never happened. We are so convinced that whoever we are talking to might turn their nose up in disgust of our ignorance that we nod along religiously and throw in a couple of cliché statements like, 'It's so touching' or 'gripping' or 'a real page-turner'. You hope the trailer of the film adaptation you watched once or the review you read long ago will help you get through this awkward situation.

My Harry-Potter-shame has haunted me my entire life. There were the Potter-themed birthday parties I would attend as a child, where I would dress in the best costume I could copy from studying the film posters outside the town cinema. The Quidditch party games I would have to partake in, running around with a mop between my legs pretending I knew the rules. Past childhood, the book shame followed me into my teenage years. There were the jokes about life at Hogwarts, and all of my peers would laugh but me. It was like everyone I knew was in on an inside joke the scale of a generation, and I was the only one not told the punch line. Even now, at university studying English, I have been subject to being excluded from the Potter references in some of my lectures. I've even mastered a special fake-Potter-laugh for these occasions.

I know what you're going to say. Why don't you just read it? It's not that hard. Just pick it up. Well, reader, I do have my reasons. I have a memory of a time before I read to myself,  sitting in my bed whilst my mother read to me Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. Mum reached a point in the book when she claimed it was too scary to read to me. She said we would stop reading the books, and even though part of me wanted her to continue, a bigger cowardly and submissive part of me agreed. I said an obliging, 'Yes, mummy'. And that was the end of my relationship with the Potter world.

Even though my classmates devoured the Potter books, I was hungry for the Roald Dahl world. Whilst my friends fantasized about learning spells and magic, I would imagine I was an elegant spider in a giant flying peach or an additional child with a golden ticket whom Charlie wanted to share his fortune with. I read the Sammy Keyes novels, and because of Harry Potter I had no one to discuss them with. Rowling seemed to have a literary monopoly over my generation, and I was a lone guerilla warrior sticking it to 'the man'. But despite my determination to remain removed, I still carry my book shame with me to this day.


DEAR READER: Do you have 'book shame'? What do you pretend you have read?

Thursday 12 September 2013

Literary Tourism #1: George Orwell

I was walking in London yesterday, taking in the colourful houses of Portobello Road, when something bright blue caught my eye. A blue plaque! I was standing right outside George Orwell's house!


I love 1984, mainly for the emotional and unsettling impact upon the reader in the final pages, so as soon as I saw this plaque I whipped out my phone and joined the other tourists taking photos. It reminded me of a time a couple of years ago when I was walking through Cambridge and I spotted St. Botolph's church, which was the namesake of Ted Hughes and Sylvia Plath's poetry journal. At the time, I was writing a long essay on the two poets and I was swimming in their biographies. I got maybe a bit too overexcited about it, including squealing and taking photos, much to the embarrassment of the boy.